Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 01:56

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
10-year Treasury yield rises ahead of key jobs report - CNBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Mariners' vibes turn ugly after sweep: 'Nobody feels sorry for us' - The Seattle Times
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
The Day the Earth Smiled: Earth, the Moon, and Saturn All in One Frame - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is CPA affiliate marketing real or a scam?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
⋆𐙚₊˚⊹♡ best K-pop Rappers In Your Own opinion?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
At least 45 Palestinians killed while waiting for aid trucks in Gaza, health officials say - AP News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.